Hi Roland,
If the 3.1 code base doesn't have the support to handle connection-based
authentication states, how does NTLMv1 work? Is the NTLMv1 implementation
in 3.1 datagram-oriented as opposed to connection-based?
Cathy Kegley
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[email protected]>
Date: 03/06/2008 01:50 AM
Subject: Re: NTLMv2 in Apache HttpClient
Hi Cathy,
> who can I work with to make sure my solution is
> something both IBM and Apache are happy with?
at Apache, all design discussions happen on the
public mailing lists. For HC, that is this mailing
list. I understand that you cannot provide code
for review until you've run through your approval
process. But you can still discuss with us on a
non-code level in the public. I will know on which
items I should not comment.
> To give you an idea of my time frame, I hope to
> have a working implementation by the end of May or
> mid-June. (Unless things go awry.)
I won't have the connection management ready to
handle connection-based authentication state by
then, but we don't have that in the 3.1 codebase
either :-)
cheers,
Roland
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
