We're still receiving an occasional stacktrace like
--
java.lang.IllegalStateException: No entry created for this pool.
HttpRoute[{}->http://binders.links.limewire.com]
at
org.apache.http.impl.conn.tsccm.RouteSpecificPool.freeEntry(RouteSpecificPool.java:184)
at
org.apache.http.impl.conn.tsccm.ConnPoolByRoute.freeEntry(ConnPoolByRoute.java:394)
at
org.apache.http.impl.conn.tsccm.ThreadSafeClientConnManager.releaseConnection(ThreadSafeClientConnManager.java:227)
at
org.apache.http.impl.conn.AbstractClientConnAdapter.releaseConnection(AbstractClientConnAdapter.java:352)
at
org.apache.http.conn.BasicManagedEntity.releaseManagedConnection(BasicManagedEntity.java:213)
at
org.apache.http.conn.BasicManagedEntity.eofDetected(BasicManagedEntity.java:165)
at
org.apache.http.conn.EofSensorInputStream.checkEOF(EofSensorInputStream.java:239)
at
org.apache.http.conn.EofSensorInputStream.read(EofSensorInputStream.java:179)
at org.limewire.io.IOUtils.readFully(IOUtils.java:350)
at
org.limewire.promotion.PromotionBinderFactoryImpl.newBinder(PromotionBinderFactoryImpl.java:42)
at
org.limewire.promotion.AbstractPromotionBinderRequestor.request(AbstractPromotionBinderRequestor.java:82)
at
org.limewire.promotion.PromotionBinderRepositoryImpl.getBinderForBucketOnNetwork(PromotionBinderRepositoryImpl.java:69)
at
org.limewire.promotion.PromotionBinderRepositoryImpl.getBinderForBucket(PromotionBinderRepositoryImpl.java:50)
at
org.limewire.promotion.PromotionSearcherImpl$Searcher.run(PromotionSearcherImpl.java:138)
at
org.limewire.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1006)
at
org.limewire.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:549)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
--
That's with a snapshot jar from before the most recent fix (though I
don't think the fix touched code related to this). I don't think it's
a blocker though (and it's a very rare bug)... so i'll cast my +1 for
releasing.
Sam
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 10:16 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/5/4 Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Folks
> >
> > Would be okay now to proceed with the release?
> >
> > Sebastian,
> >
> > Is there anything else you are planning to do for this release?
> >
>
> No.
>
> I'd like to start adding the concurrency markers, but that will be an
> ongoing process.
>
>
> > Oleg
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 00:54 +0200, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> > > All right. The release called off until HTTPCLIENT-769 fix is
> > > confirmed.
> > >
> > > Oleg
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 12:35 +0200, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> > > > Please vote on releasing these packages as HttpComponents Client
> > 4.0-alpha4. The vote is open for the
> > > > next 72 hours, and only votes from HttpComponents PMC members are
> > binding. The vote passes if at least
> > > > three binding +1 votes are cast.
> > > >
> > > > Packages:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~olegk/httpclient-4.0-alpha4/packages/
> > > >
> > > > Release notes:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~olegk/httpclient-4.0-alpha4/RELEASE_NOTES.txt
> > > >
> > > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Vote: HttpComponents Client 4.0-alpha4 release
> > > > [ ] +1 Release the packages as HttpComponents Client 4.0-alpha4.
> > > > [ ] -1 I am against releasing the packages (must include a reason).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
