[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12783874#action_12783874
 ] 

Oleg Kalnichevski commented on HTTPCLIENT-895:
----------------------------------------------

I do not think that reverting back to using static logs would be such a good 
idea. We just need to make sure that no Log object lookups take place on 
critical execution paths. That is, there no Log objects should be created on a 
per request basis. Objects created in the course of request execution should be 
reusing Log object of the HttpClient instance.

Oleg

> Log creation impairs performance
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HTTPCLIENT-895
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-895
>             Project: HttpComponents HttpClient
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: HttpClient
>    Affects Versions: 4.0 Final
>            Reporter: Tony Poppleton
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HTTPCLIENT-895.patch
>
>
> Running JProfiler on a program that uses HttpClient with a 
> ThreadSafeClientConnManager, revealed that 5% of the time was spent 
> constructing Log instances in class ClientParamsStack.
> Oleg did some further investigation and found that DefaultRequestDirector 
> also has the same problem.
> A simple solution would be to make the Log a static member variable, and do 
> this on all classes for consistency.  However this might not be the best 
> solution for interoperating with some frameworks (see 
> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Logging/StaticLog)
> Another solution would be to simply remove the Log from the affected classes, 
> although they are presumably there for a reason...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to