[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12870587#action_12870587
]
Joe Campbell commented on HTTPCLIENT-941:
-----------------------------------------
Yeah - As I was doing the conversion I noted that they are syntactically only
slight variations of one another. They also follow slightly different mocking
philosophy:
Mockito by default seems to create a 'Nice' mock
EasyMock by default seems to create a 'Strict' mock
Not entirely sure which one I like better, they both seem to fit the bill.
Thanks Oleg,
Joe
> Standardize on a common mocking framework (either EasyMock or Mockito)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HTTPCLIENT-941
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-941
> Project: HttpComponents HttpClient
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Cache, HttpAuth
> Reporter: Oleg Kalnichevski
> Fix For: 4.1 Alpha3
>
> Attachments: Convert_httpclient_from_Mockito_to_EasyMock_.patch
>
>
> We are currently using EasyMock in the caching module and Mockito in the main
> module. While Mockito appears to have a somewhat nicer API, the sheer number
> of test cases based on EasyMock in the caching module makes it much simpler
> to replace Mockito with EasyMock than the other way around.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
