Correct, didn't spoted that ... On 8 September 2011 10:55, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 10:41 +0300, Vasile Alin wrote: >> RFC 2616 also states: >> >> Bodies on GET requests have no defined semantics. >> >> That can be translated as "the server will ignore them". >> > > This statement is not even from RFC 2616 but from a draft specification > which has not been approved and is still under review. RFC 2616 is > crystal clear as to what HTTP methods are meant to enclose a content > body, but there is no point repeating myself. > > Oleg > > >> On 8 September 2011 10:33, Alexey Levan (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > [ >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13100130#comment-13100130 >> > ] >> > >> > Alexey Levan commented on HTTPCLIENT-1124: >> > ------------------------------------------ >> > >> > But in RFC 2616 all methods can have an entity (see above). Which is >> > confirmed by one of HTTP authors (see above). So I think it's about time >> > to change HttpClient. >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
