On 14 September 2011 19:04, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:50 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 12 September 2011 17:12, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Please vote on releasing the Maven artifacts as HttpComponents parent pom 5. >>> >>> The previous release of the pom was 4.1.1; with this release we are >>> moving to an independent release cycle for the parent pom. This >>> decoupling will make it easier to provide fixes in future. >>> >>> The main changes since 4.1.1 are: >>> - updated to current version of all plugins and dependencies >>> - fixed duplicate reference to resources plugin >>> - added buildnumber plugin; add tag name and last changed revision to >>> jar manifests >>> - added snapshot repo definition >>> - only generate mailing-lists page for parent; add detailed header to the >>> page >>> - added Announce list to mailing list page >>> - added Markmail archive references >>> - site plugin now works with Maven 3 >>> - added version properties for all report plugins (needed for Maven3) >>> >>> The vote is open for at least 72 hours. >>> Anyone may vote, but only votes from HttpComponents PMC members are binding. >>> The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast and there >>> are more +1 than -1 votes. >>> >>> Maven artefacts: >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehttpcomponents-050/ >>> >>> SVN tag: >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpcomponents/project/tags/5-RC1/ >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Vote: HttpComponents Core 4.2-alpha1 release >>> [ ] +1 Release the packages as HttpComponents Core 4.2-alpha1. >>> [ ] -1 I am against releasing the packages (must include a reason). >> >> Oops - just realised that the vote mail was wrong - we've all voted >> (again) on releasing HttpComponents Core 4.2-alpha1 release !! >> >> Sorry about that - reused an existing mail and forgot to change that bit. >> >> This may cause confusion in future and is not a valid vote. >> >> So I'm cancelling this vote thread and restarting. >> >> Apologies. >> > > The subject line, first sentence, and the artifact URLs are all > correct though aren't they, whach are mainly what i'd noticed? So if > thats true i'd be totally fine with just continuing with a passed > vote.
True, but without a valid vote the RM is personally responsible for the release contents, and it's remotely possible the vote might later be challenged. As RM here I'd rather be safe than sorry! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
