On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:51 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2 February 2012 12:38, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote: >> Please vote on releasing these packages as HttpComponents Client 4.1.3. >> The vote is open for the at least 72 hours, and only votes from >> HttpComponents PMC members are binding. The vote passes if at least >> three binding +1 votes are cast and there are more +1 than -1 votes. >> >> Packages: >> http://people.apache.org/~olegk/httpclient-4.1.3-RC1/ >> >> Release notes: >> http://people.apache.org/~olegk/httpclient-4.1.3-RC1/RELEASE_NOTES.txt >> >> Maven artefacts: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehttpcomponents-177/org/apache/httpcomponents/ >> >> SVN tag: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpcomponents/httpclient/tags/4.1.3-RC1/ > > No AL header: > src/test/java/org/apache/http/impl/client/cache/TestHttpCacheJiraNumber1147.java > > [also the one-line site.css files, but they don't count/need headers] > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Vote: HttpComponents Client 4.1.3 release >> [ ] +1 Release the packages as HttpComponents Client 4.1.3. >> [ ] -1 I am against releasing the packages (must include a reason). > > -0 > > Artifacts otherwise look fine. >
Looks ok to me too so I'm +1 on releasing. What i've been told about the license headers is that the top level LICENSE file covers everything anyway so the headers aren't 100% required and the odd missing one on a file without significant intellectual property is ok. This one is only a test class and it doesn't look like it has significant IP to me so I don't think it needs to cause a respin. ...ant --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
