[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260498#comment-13260498
 ] 

Ralf Pöhlmann commented on HTTPCLIENT-1186:
-------------------------------------------

Thanks for your quick response, I will try to elaborate on the problem.

The problem occurs when using NTLM authentication with multiple threads and a 
shared connection pool: 

One thread sends a request and authenticates a connection from the connection 
pool. Then another thread (same user) makes a request and reuses the connection 
from the first thread. While the second thread is still working the first one 
tries to send another request. As the connection is still in use by the second 
thread, the first one will get a new connection from the pool. This newly 
created connection will get authenticated but the usertoken will not be set on 
that connection. As a consequence you have a connection in your pool which is 
authenticated but not marked with a user token. This is a potential security 
risk and also a problem if the connection is reused by a request from another 
user.

Have a look at the execute() method from the DefaultRequestDirector. In my 
opinion the userToken should be set whenever you have a managed connection as 
the connection pool might have returned a new connection for that usertoken:

Basically it should look like this:
----
if (managedConn != null) {
    if (userToken == null) {
        userToken = userTokenHandler.getUserToken(context);
        context.setAttribute(ClientContext.USER_TOKEN, userToken);
    }
    if (userToken != null) {
        managedConn.setState(userToken);
    }
}
---
                
> NTLM authenticated connections are mixed
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HTTPCLIENT-1186
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1186
>             Project: HttpComponents HttpClient
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: HttpClient
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.3
>            Reporter: Ralf Pöhlmann
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: DefaultRequestDirector
>
> Executing multiple request using the same http context as recommended mixes 
> authenticated connections among different users. 
> If we execute two request usign the same context, the first request adds the 
> user token to the http context as well as to the connection properties. The 
> second request fins already a user token in the http context but if a new 
> connection will be created (no free connection in the pool) this new 
> connection is never assigned to an user token and is used independent of any 
> user context!
> see DefaultRequestDirector:
> // See if we have a user token bound to the execution context
> Object userToken = context.getAttribute(ClientContext.USER_TOKEN);
> ...
> if (managedConn != null && userToken == null) {
>    userToken = userTokenHandler.getUserToken(context);
>    context.setAttribute(ClientContext.USER_TOKEN, userToken);
>    if (userToken != null) {
>       managedConn.setState(userToken);
>    }
> }
> and RouteSpecificPool:
>     public BasicPoolEntry allocEntry(final Object state) {
>         if (!freeEntries.isEmpty()) {
>             ListIterator<BasicPoolEntry> it = 
> freeEntries.listIterator(freeEntries.size());
>             while (it.hasPrevious()) {
>                 BasicPoolEntry entry = it.previous();
>                 if (entry.getState() == null || LangUtils.equals(state, 
> entry.getState())) {
>                     it.remove();
>                     return entry;
>                 }

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to