Kevan Miller created HTTPCORE-321:
-------------------------------------

             Summary: httpcore.jar LICENSE.txt does not note JCIP-Annotations 
license info
                 Key: HTTPCORE-321
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCORE-321
             Project: HttpComponents HttpCore
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 4.2.2, 4.2.1
            Reporter: Kevan Miller


Reviewing the license information for httpcore-4.2.1.jar raised a few issues 
that I thought should be raised.

The LICENSE.txt file for the HTTP Components 4.2.1 release contains:

"This project contains annotations derived from JCIP-ANNOTATIONS
Copyright (c) 2005 Brian Goetz and Tim Peierls.
See http://www.jcip.net and the Creative Commons Attribution License 
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5)"

Presumably, this covers the four files contained within 
org/apache/http/annotation/. I also assume that the above is intended to convey 
that these files are CC-A licensed. If this is correct, IMO, the LICENSE.txt 
should be explicit about what files are CC-A licensed and should be explicit 
that the files are CC-A licensed.

The LICENSE.txt contained within the httpcore-4.2.1.jar does not contain the 
above license information. Since httpcore contains the 
org/apache/http/annotation classes, consumers of the httpcore jar may be misled 
as to the licensing of the contents of the jar. 

IMO, LICENSE.txt for httpcore should be updated with the JCIP-Annotations 
licensing information. I'd also think that the licensing information should be 
more explicit (documenting what files are CC-A licensed and clearly state that 
the files are CC-A licensed).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to