On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 07:52 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sep 14, 2013, at 7:23, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 17:25 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> HttpClient 4.2 and 4.3 requires Java 5.
> >>
> >> Which components are you talking about?
> >>
> >> Gary
> >
> > I think the question is whether or not we should retain 1.5
> > compatibility for the next release series.
> >
> > I believe that 1.5 compatibility is becoming pointless. It is getting
> > increasingly difficult to maintain while hardly helping us expand our
> > user base. As far as know there is no even official way of obtaining a
> > 1.5 JDK from Oracle.
> >
> > However having said all that I also have to admit that Java 1.6 does not
> > really bring a lot in terms of new features. We probably should also
> > consider upgrading straight to Java 1.7 in order to get full try with
> > resources support and NIO2.
> >
> > I suggest that we take this discussion to the user list and start a poll
> > on a minimal JRE level for the next release series.
> 
> It seems to me that 4.2.x and 4.3.x should stay on Java 5 and we can
> go to 6 or 7 for 4.4.
> >

That goes without saying. 4.2 is no longer being actively developed and
4.3 stays Java 1.5 compatible.

Oleg

> > Oleg
> >
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Ryan McKinley <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Now that a release is out, is it worth asking about 1.5 support?
> >>>
> >>> Obviously we should not change the system requirements unless there is a
> >>> clear gain.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> ryan
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to