[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13784007#comment-13784007
 ] 

Sidney Beekhoven commented on HTTPCLIENT-1410:
----------------------------------------------

I even wonder if the complete check should be there at all, like it is also 
stated in the comment of the BAD_COUNTRY_2LDS var:

"The [*.co.uk] problem is an interesting one.  Should we just hope
* that CA's would never foolishly allow such a certificate to happen?
* Looks like we're the only implementation guarding against this.
* Firefox, Curl, Sun Java 1.4, 5, 6 don't bother with this check."

As far as i can see there is not a fixed rule set for these kind of domains?

> AbstractVerifier.acceptableCountryWildcard check not strict enough
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HTTPCLIENT-1410
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1410
>             Project: HttpComponents HttpClient
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: HttpClient
>    Affects Versions: 4.3 Final
>            Reporter: Sidney Beekhoven
>
> I work at a company called info.nl in the Netherlands, so our domain is 
> info.nl. We have a wildcard certificate in use for several services, 
> *.info.nl.
> The AbstractVerifier has a method acceptableCountryWildcard which checks that 
> you don't use eg *.co.uk as the wildcard in the certificate. The second to 
> last domain part is checked against a fixed list, which includes info so our 
> wildcard is not accepted.
> Apparantly there are some countries where info.<countrycode> is seen as a top 
> level domain but that is not the case for the netherlands. So the check on 
> this is not strict enough and should also take into account the top level 
> domain.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to