[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13796785#comment-13796785
 ] 

Oleg Kalnichevski commented on HTTPCLIENT-1119:
-----------------------------------------------

I don't know. This only makes SNI support in Java 7 look shoddier to me. Anyway 
I am glad the problem can be worked around this way though I do not quite 
understand why creating a plain socket and then laying SSL over it should 
behave differently than just creating a SSLSocket directly (which internally 
should be doing the same anyway). I would happily commit the patch if you could 
port and re-test it with HC 4.3.

Oleg  

> Server Name Indication (SNI) Support
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HTTPCLIENT-1119
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1119
>             Project: HttpComponents HttpClient
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: HttpClient
>            Reporter: Gus Power
>              Labels: sni, ssl, tls, vhost
>             Fix For: Future
>
>         Attachments: apache_httpclient_4.2.x_sni.patch, 
> HTTPCLIENT-1119-support-SNI-on-Java-7-via-setHost-of.patch
>
>
> Provide support for Server Name Indication (SNI) support as per RFC 3546 
> (section 3.1).
> Currently attempting to connect to SNI enabled host 'expectedhost' over SSL 
> using http client results in an SSLException similar to:
> javax.net.ssl.SSLException: hostname in certificate didn't match: 
> <expectedhost> != <defaulthost>
>   at 
> org.apache.http.conn.ssl.AbstractVerifier.verify(AbstractVerifier.java:220)
> We use SNI on some of our environments and were trying to use httpclient to 
> automatically test host access and availability.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to