[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCORE-367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13850695#comment-13850695
 ] 

Girish Nair commented on HTTPCORE-367:
--------------------------------------

Hi Oleg,

We ran into this problem as well. At that time, your fix wasn't available and 
so we made a temporary fix as follows. Is there any known issue with rolling 
back the while loop to an if block? Why did you make the initial change to 
using the while loop. We are thinking of removing our temporary fix and getting 
v4.3.1 with your fix. Just wanted to be aware of any issues if there are with 
the rollback of the change.

Thank you,
Girish Nair

            if (this.contentDecoder != null) {
                // Loop until there is interest in input,
                // decoder is not done and there is buffered session data
                while ((this.session.getEventMask() & SelectionKey.OP_READ) > 
0) {
                    final int initLength = this.inbuf.length();
                    handler.inputReady(this, this.contentDecoder);
                    if (this.contentDecoder.isCompleted()) {
                        // Response entity received
                        // Ready to receive a new response
                        resetInput();
                        break;
                    }
                    if (!this.inbuf.hasData()) {
                        break;
                    }
                    if (this.inbuf.length() == initLength) {
                        // Decoder did not consume data
                        // Not enough data to process
                        break;
                    }
                }
            }


> DefaultNHttpClientConnection enters infinite loop when consuming chunked 
> response
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HTTPCORE-367
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCORE-367
>             Project: HttpComponents HttpCore
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: HttpCore NIO
>    Affects Versions: 4.3
>         Environment: Java 1.7.0_40
>            Reporter: Paul McLellan
>             Fix For: 4.3.1
>
>
> We recently upgraded from 4.3-beta2 to 4.3 and noticed that our client was 
> not fully consuming large (~64K) responses from the server. A little digging 
> led us to the 'consumeInput(NHttpClientEventHandler)' method of 
> DefaultNHttpClientConnection. Within this method, the following logic from 
> 4.3-beta2:
> if (this.contentDecoder != null && (this.session.getEventMask() & 
> SelectionKey.OP_READ) > 0) {
>     handler.inputReady(this, this.contentDecoder);
>     if (this.contentDecoder.isCompleted()) {
>         // Response entity received
>         // Ready to receive a new response
>         resetInput();
>     }
> }
> Has been replaced with:
> if (this.contentDecoder != null) {
>     // Loop until there is interest in input,
>     // decoder is not done and there is buffered session data
>     while ((this.session.getEventMask() & SelectionKey.OP_READ) > 0) {
>         handler.inputReady(this, this.contentDecoder);
>         if (this.contentDecoder.isCompleted()) {
>             // Response entity received
>             // Ready to receive a new response
>             resetInput();
>             break;
>         }
>         if (!this.inbuf.hasData()) {
>             break;
>         }
>     }
> }
> This is causing the dispatcher thread to become stuck in an infinite loop 
> when it reaches the end of the first chunk because the input buffer contains 
> a single character ('\r') that is never consumed by the ChunkDecoder. Prior 
> to the upgrade this method would exit and the dispatcher thread would be able 
> to read the next chunk from the inbound channel.
> Can you help with this issue please? Any assistance/guidance would be greatly 
> appreciated.
> Thanks.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to