+1 for the switch I have used git on other open source projects, I think git encourages people to contribute on open source projects because you don't need to be a committer to send pull requests.
2014-02-03 Karl Wright <[email protected]>: > I think the factors that go into deciding to make a switch of this nature > are as follows: > > - the match between the source control system and the project environment; > e.g., do people make svn copies of the hierarchy from other projects for > various reasons > - whether the project is immediately suitable for transfer e.g. (directory > issue as mentioned before) > - the preference of the committers > - the future of the source control system chosen > > I think the first two are unknown, the third point looks to be in favor of > git, and the last point is currently immaterial. Before switching I'd want > more clarity on all of these, as much as possible. > > So, -1 for now (although I could be convinced with some research). > Karl > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Sun, 2014-02-02 at 17:12 -0500, Karl Wright wrote: > > > My vote probably doesn't count -- but a lot of folks have difficulty > with > > > git. For example, since git does not manage directories, usually there > > are > > > issues in porting projects having to do with directories either hanging > > > around and/or not existing in git when they are expected to be present. > > > svn still has a huge following, also -- it's by no means a dead > project. > > > > > > Karl > > > > > > > Karl > > > > We are not debating whether or not Git is better than Svn, but rather > > whether Git would work better for us. You are a committer on the project > > and your opinion does count. > > > > Oleg > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >
