>>>>>> Are you sure about that? What would this method do for GET requests given than those requests are not even supposed to enclose an entity? <<<<<<
It would return false for any request implementation that did not support expect-continue, of course. The advantage of this kind of structure is that it does not rely on the implicit instanceof operator, but rather an explicit method implementation, so it is clearer (and more flexible). Karl On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 07:55 -0400, Karl Wright wrote: > > FWIW, a better way for this kind of thing to be done would be for the > > request object to have a method, e.g. "supportsExpectContinue()", that > you > > would call, instead of relying on class names and hierarchy ... > > > > Are you sure about that? What would this method do for GET requests > given than those requests are not even supposed to enclose an entity? > > Oleg > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
