On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 10:57 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 10:19 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 08:17 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > >> > Why no site? > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> *sigh* because site is not part of release artifacts. > > > >> > > > > > > > > Yes, but as part of the release process it would help reviewing the RC > > by > > > > looking at reports. > > > > > > > > > > For example, how do I know all files have the right license header > > without > > > a RAT report? > > > > > > > Like, by running RAT against the source dist, no? > > > > Hm, I consider it part of the RM's duty to create all of these reports. > > The people how VOTE can inspect the reports... >
RM's duty based on what? RM's duty is produce release artifacts. Nether site content nor reports of any sort are not release artifacts. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
