On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 12:47 +0000, sebb wrote: > On 9 December 2014 at 09:41, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Author: olegk > > Date: Tue Dec 9 09:41:27 2014 > > New Revision: 1644011 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1644011 > > Log: > > Added @Obsolete and @Experimental annotations > > Good idea, but Obsolete sounds rather like a synonym for Deprecated to me. > > I wonder if it might be better to use a more specific name, e.g. > > ObsoleteProtocol >
It is in a way a synonym for Deprecated that does not cause compile warnings. I am currently working on RFC 6265 compliant cookie spec implementation(s) that render RFC 2109 / RFC 2965 compatible ones obsolete. I would like to discourage their use without explicitly making them deprecated (which may suggest their are no longer adequately maintained) while still keeping them around for compatibility reasons. Feel free to rename Obsolete to something more appropriate. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
