OK, I just did the getCode() bit. Gary
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 09:08 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 08:54 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > There are a lot of places where we say: > > > > > > > > response.getStatusLine().getStatusCode() > > > > > > > > Should we have a short cut > > > > > > > > response.getStatusCode() > > > > > > HttpResponse#getCode might do as well. > > > > > > > Sounds good. > > > > This: > > > > > response.getStatusLine().getStatusCode() > > > > could also be: > > > > > response.getStatusLine().getCode() > > > > Since there is only one kind of code in a status line. > > > > But I am not sure that's worth it. > > > > Probably not. > > Oleg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
