On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Justi Kd <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > You are welcome to approach them on our behalf if you feel strongly > > about the issue. > > > > Oleg > > > > > > > > > > > I think it's quite important to remove this because what seems trivial or > non-issue > for us developers may prove to be an obstacle when challenged by > managers/legal folks > and at the end of the day it's about replying: this is ASL2 OR this is > ASL2 'but' and > I don't think we need to be put in a position to explain any 'but' or deal > with any > adoption barrier that might pop later due to this. > > Anyway, I did some searches and I couldn't find direct contact info for > the authors > (excluding twitter). I'll keep on searching but if you have any 'ideas' > don't hesitate > to send me a direct email. > > Another way to resolve this would be to somehow make these "optional" and > state that > this library *optionally* depends on these by doing x,y,z and are not > required to make > use of the library. > > > > > Nothing through: http://jcip.net/authors.html ? Gary -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
