[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15904727#comment-15904727
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on HTTPCLIENT-1828:
--------------------------------------------

bq. You are very welcome to have a different opinion but a simple, irrefutable 
fact is that HttpClient 4.x has been built to conform to RFC 2616. It makes no 
sense to make it partially compliant with RFC723x in some areas and 
non-complaint in some others.

Well, it should be built to conform to HTTP/1.1. Being partially compliant to 
the newer spec certainly isn't ideal, but nor is it to be compliant to an 
obsolete spec.

bq. And what makes absolutely no sense of what so ever is DELETE and GET with 
enclosed entity.

I agree that it shouldn't be used. The question is whether the HTTP client 
library should enforce this.

> HttpDelete does not extend HttpEntityEnclosingRequestBase
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HTTPCLIENT-1828
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1828
>             Project: HttpComponents HttpClient
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 4.5.1, 4.5.2, 4.5.3
>            Reporter: Saravanakumar Selvaraj
>             Fix For: 4.5.4, 5.0 Alpha1
>
>
> Sending body in DELETE is allowed as the HTTP 1.1 specification does not 
> forbid. Hence HttpDelete.class should extend from 
> HttpEntityEnclosingRequestBase instead of HttpRequestBase.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org

Reply via email to