On Thu, 2017-05-11 at 00:00 +0200, Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2017-05-10 um 23:48 schrieb Oleg Kalnichevski: > > On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 23:25 +0200, Michael Osipov wrote: > > > >
... > > I am not sure I understand what you mean by git apply. > > > > Can we go back to what appears to be the only sticking point here? > > > > It seems pretty clear that major release branches do not need to be > > in > > different repos. Local clones per major release are perfectly > > sufficient. > > > > The question is whether or not people can live with HEADs of > > release > > branches being volatile for a short period of time (not more than a > > few > > days) until every active committer gets used to using dev branches > > for > > building change sets? > > To be more precise: do you want to do this only once or before every > release? > I want to be able to do it on a case by case basis. Like the one we just had. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org
