On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 19:56 +0000, Schmitt, Ryan wrote:
> Why is it that EntityDetails#getContentType returns a String and not
> a ContentType, even though ContentType is used as the internal
> representation in BasicEntityDetails? 

EntityDetails is used to represent both incoming and outgoing message
entities. In order to avoid having to parse the 'Content-Type' header
value by default it is returned as a String.


> Should new APIs (such as ReactiveEntityProducer) accept a ContentType
> or a String?

It should be using ContentType in my opinion.

Oleg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to