This is still a beta release, right? My understanding is that we're going
to treat it as a release candidate and try to avoid breaking changes, but
we can still make them if necessary (e.g. to fix some show-stopping defect).

On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 11:08 AM Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, 2020-01-01 at 14:00 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I think b11 can go ahead.
> >
> > Gary
>
>
> Folks
>
> That effectively means no more renaming and moving things around
> without deprecation and a migration path.
>
> I will proceed with the release later today or tomorrow.
>
> Oleg
>
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 1, 2020, 12:33 Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2020-01-01 at 09:54 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 9:43 AM Gary Gregory <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 9:23 AM Gary Gregory <
> > > [email protected]
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 8:47 AM Michael Osipov <
> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Am 2020-01-01 um 14:45 schrieb Oleg Kalnichevski:
> > > > > > > > Folks
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Shall I proceed with HttpCore 5.0-beta11 release or not?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Do we still need to rename anything in core?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nothing left on my list. From my POV, you may go ahead.
> > > Gary,
> > > > > > > Ryan?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We did a good but partial job of cleaning up enums.
> > > Specifically,
> > > > > > we did not circle back to our dual AuthSchemes and AuthScheme
> > > > > > types.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I will experiment now with something like renaming
> > > AuthSchemes to
> > > > > > StandardAuthScheme and having it implement an interface
> > > > > > lie AuthScheme.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > A very quick look suggests that such a design will not work
> > > since
> > > > > AuthScheme implementations carry state.
> > > > >
> > > > > At the very least we should rename  AuthSchemes to
> > > > > StandardAuthScheme.
> > > > >
> > > > > WDYT? I'll make a PR.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > This is for the client, not core, doh.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Gary,
> > >
> > > Is there _anything_ that blocks the release of _core_ in your
> > > opinion?
> > > While core is being released there will still be time to work on
> > > client.
> > >
> > > Oleg
> > >
> > >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to