On Fri, 2020-04-17 at 21:46 +0200, Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2020-04-17 um 17:54 schrieb Torsten Rendelmann: > > Hello, > > > > Just want to know if this was yet dicussed (is there no "search" > > available via HTTP mail archive(s)??)
Markmail has a pretty decent search functionality https://markmail.org/search/?q=order%3Adate-backward+list%3Aorg.apache.hc So does Pony Mail https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@hc.apache.org > > or approved: > > I like to have the URIBuilder supports > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6068 > > > > Currently the tested version 5.0 has a strange behavior, not > > preserving > > the (private) field "encodedSchemeSpecificPart", if e.g. > > .setParameter() > > calls used to build a "mailto:m...@email.com?subject=xyz&body=mailbod > > y" URLs: > > > > new URIBuilder("mailto:my@email.server";) only works, but > > new URIBuilder("mailto:my@email.server";).setParameter("subject > > ", > > "mail subject") .setParameter("body", "mail body") fails > > > > Also there are no setter/getter for the field > > "encodedSchemeSpecificPart" to add the e-mail address; > > that might help to get around the current missing support. > > You should open a JIRA issue for this. Otherwise this will get > lost... > Please note that java.net.URI conforms to RFC 2396 only. Therefore I reviewed URIBuilder for compliance with RFC 2396 up to this point. Please provide a unit test demonstrating what you see as incorrect behavior of URIBuilder with failing asserts. If the actual behavior of URIBuilder violates RFC 2396 we will fix it. We can also consider making URIBuilder compliant with newer specs as a feature request. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org
