On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 17:41 +0100, Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2021-02-02 um 23:28 schrieb Oleg Kalnichevski: > > On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 23:21 +0100, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > > Le mardi 2 février 2021, 22:57:40 CET Oleg Kalnichevski a écrit : > > > > On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 22:40 +0100, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > > > > Le mardi 2 février 2021, 21:08:52 CET Oleg Kalnichevski a > > > > > écrit : > > > > > > On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 08:30 +0100, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > > > > > > Le samedi 30 janvier 2021, 18:32:35 CET Gary Gregory a > > > > > > > écrit > > > > > > > : > > > > > > > > Hi Hervé, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your hard work on this! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are these two "LATEST" URLs supposed to be up? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if someone from the team (with commit access) wants to > > > > > > > execute > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > publication > > > > > > > (and do the manual init step to create base svn > > > > > > > directory): > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/pull/280 > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Hervé > > > > > > > > > > > > I published HttpCore 5.1-beta3 content generated with Maven > > > > > > Site to > > > > > > as > > > > > > per your instructions: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://hc.apache.org/components/httpcomponents-core-5.1.x/LATEST/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of it looks pretty useless to me except for Javadocs > > > > > > and > > > > > > Clirr > > > > > > reports. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not quite sure how you propose we should make use of > > > > > > that > > > > > > content. > > > > > > > > > > > > Shall we just link the reports from the main project > > > > > > website > > > > > > and > > > > > > let > > > > > > the rest be? > > > > > > > > > > yes, exactly, no revolution > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > > > Thank you, Hervé. Fundamentally the plan is to have non- > > > > versioned > > > > (release series specific) content at > > > > > > > > httpcomponents-core-5.1.x/ > > > > > > > > and versioned (version specific) content at > > > > > > > > httpcomponents-core-5.1.x/5.1-beta3 > > > > httpcomponents-core-5.1.x/5.1.0 > > > > httpcomponents-core-5.1.x/5.1.1 > > > > httpcomponents-core-5.1.x/5.1.2 > > > > > > > > > > > > Do I get it correctly? > > > exactly > > > > > > > What are the benefits? History? Fundamentally only the last patch > > release in the release series is of any practical use. > > Traceability and branches are cheap with Subversion. It only stores > the > delta. > > > It might as well just be > > > > httpcomponents-core-5.1.x/LATEST > > Please note that one can push generated non-stable stuff to this > while > the stable will point to. I consider it logically. Since we are > tagging > our source code and finalize its produced binaries in Maven Central, > so > should this apply to any other generated content.
This is precisely why versioned reports should also go into Maven Central. That is what we do with javadocs and sources. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
