[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-2204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Kennedy updated HTTPCLIENT-2204:
---------------------------------------
Description:
Similar to HTTPCLIENT-2202
There appears to be a regression from 4.x to 5.x in which
[MemcachedHttpAsyncCacheStorage|https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/blob/master/httpclient5-cache/src/main/java/org/apache/hc/client5/http/impl/cache/memcached/MemcachedHttpAsyncCacheStorage.java]
now requires the MemcachedClient object instead of the interface
MemcachedClientIF. The class doesn't use any functionality outside of the
interface, so why require anything higher than the interface?
Changing to use MemcachedClientIF would be backward compatible since
MemcachedClient implements this interface already.
was:
Similar to
[HTTPCLIENT-2202|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-2202]
There appears to be a regression from 4.x to 5.x in which
MemcachedHttpAsyncCacheStorage now requires the MemcachedClient object instead
of the interface MemcachedClientIF. The class doesn't use any functionality
outside of the interface, so why require anything higher than the interface?
Changing to use MemcachedClientIF would be backward compatible since
MemcachedClient implements this interface already.
> MemcachedAsyncHttpCacheStorage should use MemcachedClientIF interface
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HTTPCLIENT-2204
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-2204
> Project: HttpComponents HttpClient
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: HttpCache
> Affects Versions: 5.0, 5.1, 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.1.3
> Reporter: Robert Kennedy
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.2-alpha2
>
>
> Similar to HTTPCLIENT-2202
>
> There appears to be a regression from 4.x to 5.x in which
> [MemcachedHttpAsyncCacheStorage|https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/blob/master/httpclient5-cache/src/main/java/org/apache/hc/client5/http/impl/cache/memcached/MemcachedHttpAsyncCacheStorage.java]
> now requires the MemcachedClient object instead of the interface
> MemcachedClientIF. The class doesn't use any functionality outside of the
> interface, so why require anything higher than the interface?
> Changing to use MemcachedClientIF would be backward compatible since
> MemcachedClient implements this interface already.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]