HI Oleg, Yes, I think you are right. I have reworked the prototype to use the async transport underneath while keeping the same contract model, with CompletableFuture / Future support for non-blocking calls.
Arturo On Sat, Mar 28, 2026 at 6:17 PM Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2026-03-28 at 17:43 +0100, Arturo Bernal wrote: > > HI Oleg, > > > > I have put together a first client-side prototype and opened a PR for > > it: > > > > https://github.com/apache/httpcomponents-client/pull/816 > > > > > > Arturo > > > > That was fast, somewhat too fast, but it does look like what I had in > mind. I will do a proper review during the Easter break. > > Wouldn't the async transport be a better choice here? > > Oleg > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 9:45 PM Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2026-03-27 at 20:55 +0100, Arturo Bernal wrote: > > > > HI Oleg, > > > > > > > > I’ll take a look at what a small JAX-RS-style container on top of > > > > HttpCore > > > > could look like. > > > > > > > > cheers > > > > > > > > Arturo > > > > > > Hi Arturo > > > > > > Consider looking at the client side first. Think of something like > > > Quarkus Rest client: > > > > > > https://quarkus.io/guides/rest-client > > > > > > One defines an interface with jakarta.ws.rs annotations as a > > > contract > > > and the library generates its implementation at runtime with > > > HttpClient > > > behind the interface. > > > > > > > > > If it goes well, you enjoy doing it and gets some traction we can > > > consider moving it to core and expand into the server side. > > > > > > Oleg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 8:55 PM Oleg Kalnichevski > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Christ, I am getting old. Sorry, Arturo. The rest of it stands. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2026-03-26 at 20:54 +0100, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > > > > > Alberto > > > > > > > > > > > > You have recently created several large pull requests with > > > > > > complex > > > > > > features that I do not see as particularly useful and > > > > > > therefore I > > > > > > see > > > > > > no great urgency in having them reviewed and merged. I will > > > > > > review > > > > > > some > > > > > > of then during the coming Easter break but that is that. > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not know your motivation for picking those specific > > > > > > features, > > > > > > the > > > > > > choice is entirely yours, but if you want to build something > > > > > > very > > > > > > cool > > > > > > and very useful consider building a small container that > > > > > > implements a > > > > > > subset of jakarta.ws.rs on top of HttpCore or HttpClient. Now > > > > > > that > > > > > > there is a JSON message bindings we should have all the > > > > > > building > > > > > > blocks > > > > > > for it. > > > > > > > > > > > > It would certainly be more useful than some URI parser in my > > > > > > opinion. > > > > > > > > > > > > Oleg > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
