Ok, that makes sense to me.

Unless there are strong objections, lets wait on the user@ list until we
determine we need it.

Adam

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah my biggest thing with the user@ list is that we don't really have a
> ton of users yet and really the devs are still the users while in the
> Incubator. If you search around on the OODT lists through our Incubation
> (and SVN, etc.) there is discussion of this. I'll try and find some
> pointers to the thread.
>
> Once we have made some releases and have data points that we are really
> seeing user@ emails on the dev@ list that shouldn't be polluting it, then
> I would advocate having a user@ list.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
> On 1/4/13 7:49 AM, "Adam Berry" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >I think the argument to having one separate from dev, is that dev is where
> >the jira traffic goes, and I think a place for user discussion without
> >that
> >traffic would be a good thing.
> >
> >I'm not completely stuck on having user@ though, so thoughts?
> >
> >On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
> >[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> FYI user list doesn't exist ‹ do we need one?
> >>
> >> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[email protected]<mailto:
> >> [email protected]>>
> >> Date: Thursday, January 3, 2013 10:01 PM
> >> To: "[email protected]<mailto:
> >> [email protected]>" <
> >> [email protected]<mailto:
> >> [email protected]>>
> >> Subject: Undeliverable: <no subject>
> >>
> >>
> >> Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
> >>
> >> [email protected]<mailto:
> >> [email protected]>
> >> The e-mail address you entered couldn't be found. Please check the
> >> recipient's e-mail address and try to resend the message. If the problem
> >> continues, please contact your helpdesk.
> >>
> >> The following organization rejected your message: mx1.us.apache.org.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Diagnostic information for administrators:
> >>
> >> Generating server: mail.jpl.nasa.gov
> >>
> >> [email protected]<mailto:
> >> [email protected]>
> >> mx1.us.apache.org #<mx1.us.apache.org #5.1.1 SMTP; 550 mail to
> >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> not
> >> accepted here> #SMTP#
> >>
> >> Original message headers:
> >>
> >> Return-Path: <[email protected]<mailto:
> >> [email protected]>>
> >> Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov
> >>(ap-ehub-sp01.jpl.nasa.gov[128.149.137.148])
> >>         by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2)
> >>with
> >> ESMTP id r04612YV014764
> >>         (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits) verified
> >>NO)
> >>         for <[email protected]<mailto:
> >> [email protected]>>; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 22:01:02
> >>-0800
> >> Received: from AP-EMBX-SP20.RES.AD.JPL ([169.254.8.182]) by
> >>  ap-ehub-sp01.RES.AD.JPL ([169.254.3.97]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001;
> >> Thu, 3
> >>  Jan 2013 22:01:02 -0800
> >> From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <[email protected]<mailto:
> >> [email protected]>>
> >> To: "[email protected]<mailto:
> >> [email protected]>"
> >>         <[email protected]<mailto:
> >> [email protected]>>
> >> Subject: <no subject>
> >> Thread-Topic: <no subject>
> >> Thread-Index: AQHN6kDfUppiv6qobU2DF5FEmOcQJA==
> >> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 06:01:01 +0000
> >> Message-ID:
> >>
> >><[email protected]
> <mailto:
> >> [email protected]>>
> >> Accept-Language: en-US
> >> Content-Language: en-US
> >> X-MS-Has-Attach:
> >> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
> >> user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010
> >> x-originating-ip: [128.149.137.114]
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >> Content-ID: <[email protected]<mailto:
> >> [email protected]>>
> >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >> MIME-Version: 1.0
> >> X-Source-Sender: [email protected]<mailto:
> >> [email protected]>
> >> X-AUTH: Authorized
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to