Hi Srimanth,

I am able to connect the servers(HDFS/Zk) and explore them. It works as
expected.J

There is one thing that I noticed, the HDFS server is getting created in
the Project Explorer while the ZK one gets created in Hadoop Servers. Is
this expected ?  shouldn't both of them be in Hadoop Servers panel ? I
thought of checking with you before opening a jira.

regards
Rahul


On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Srimanth Gunturi <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hello,
> Requesting review and commit of patch attached to
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDT-40.
> Was able to connect to ZK and HDFS services, and browse as expected.
> Would be great if others could verify it works for them too.
> Regards,
> Srimanth
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Srimanth Gunturi <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > With Rahul's excellent work in getting maven build issues resolved, we
> > will be able to get back to feature development.
> > A good release point for the project would be to have all the features of
> > HDT and Hadoop-Eclipse projects working.
> >
> > The big missing piece of this merge is the existing MapReduce
> > functionality of HDT.
> > I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDT-41 to address
> > this issue.
> > I would like to request assignment of HDT-41 and HDT-40 to me, as I have
> > started work on it.
> >
> > I will upload patches as soon as I have them locally working.
> >
> > On a side note, I would like updating of JIRA's components to include
> > 'common', 'zookeeper', 'core' and 'ui'.
> > Regards,
> > Srimanth
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Rahul Sharma <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Adam,
> >>
> >> I have made a fix for the issue at hand using tycho, bundle-classpath
> and
> >> copy-dependencies. Basically during a maven build I am copying the
> >> required
> >> dependencies into a folder. These dependencies are  referenced in
> >> MANIFEST.MF using Bundle-classpath. The copying takes place before tycho
> >> kicks in and thus these are available for  the compiler. This relieves
> us
> >> from creation of multiple modules which need to be triggered in multiple
> >> profiles. Also we  do not need to create any separate bundles as the
> >> required libs are bundles with-in the plugin. In turn we are quite
> >> portable, without sacrificing any configuration like MANIFEST,classpath
> or
> >> any of the ecllipse settings.
> >>
> >> I have uploaded  the updated patch in HDT-39[1], have a look at it and
> let
> >> me know your thoughts for the same.
> >>
> >> regards
> >> Rahul
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12602309/0001-HDT-39-Using-maven-to-build-package.patch
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Adam Berry <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Rahul,
> >> >
> >> > So I've been thinking about this. I know that we cannot build the
> >> > dependencies wrapper and the IDE plugins in the same reactor build,
> >> which
> >> > rules out the multi module approach. I looked at the current patch is
> >> up,
> >> > which makes use of profiles to separate this, as profiles are about
> >> build
> >> > portability, I'm not sure thats quite right.
> >> >
> >> > Multi module really represents how this should be done, but as we
> can't
> >> use
> >> > it I propose that we actually make a new maven project to build the
> >> > dependency wrapper plugins, and then document that to build the
> plugins
> >> > requires two maven commands (at this time). Building HDT can reference
> >> a p2
> >> > repository output from the dependency build, and this can take a local
> >> > path.
> >> >
> >> > I will work up a path with this approach, and add a comment on HDT-39
> to
> >> > this effect, and we'll see if everyone is ok with this.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Adam
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Rahul Sharma <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi Adam,
> >> > >
> >> > > This is in relation to issue HDT-39[1] of hadoop-eclipse -merging. I
> >> > > configured things using tycho but Srimanth had a different idea of
> >> > things.
> >> > > This is due to the different approach he took for hadoop-eclipse. I
> >> still
> >> > > think the same can be achieved done using tycho. There is nothing
> >> > stopping
> >> > > us to create specific bundles  for different versions of hadoop,
> >> which is
> >> > > being done at other Apache projects like servicemix, provisonr etc.
> >> > >
> >> > > Anyways, the idea was to use maven as dumb possible, just for
> >> > dependencies
> >> > > management, and not to use any of tricks of the trade. I tried to
> dig
> >> on
> >> > > the possible alternatives but I do not think besides tycho there is
> >> any
> >> > > other cleaner approach. In all the rest of the approaches we have to
> >> keep
> >> > > eclipse SDK. Apparently maven and eclipse are two separate worlds
> >> that do
> >> > > not converge easily.
> >> > >
> >> > > Let me know thoughts for the same as I think we would like to use
> >> maven
> >> > as
> >> > > that would be enable us to things like managing deps, CI, Release
> etc.
> >> > >
> >> > > regards,
> >> > > Rahul
> >> > >
> >> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDT-39
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Adam Berry <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi Rahul,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > What branch are you trying to do this on?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On master, where Tycho is used, there is a setting in the pom
> >> pointing
> >> > at
> >> > > > the necessary;
> >> > > >
> >> > > >   <repositories>
> >> > > >     <repository>
> >> > > >       <id>juno</id>
> >> > > >       <layout>p2</layout>
> >> > > >       <url>http://download.eclipse.org/releases/juno</url>
> >> > > >     </repository>
> >> > > >   </repositories>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > If you are trying to do the same with all local files you will
> need
> >> the
> >> > > > necessary p2 repositories locally, and the pom configured to use
> >> them.
> >> > I
> >> > > > think just a copy of the core Eclipse SDK repository and the JDT
> one
> >> > > should
> >> > > > be sufficient. Then you can just use file: urls to point to the
> >> local
> >> > > > spots.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Or are you trying to not use tycho here and do something else?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Adam
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Rahul Sharma <
> [email protected]>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Hi devs,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I tried doing  a maven build this via a simple copy process,
> >> where I
> >> > am
> >> > > > > copying the required dependencies and generation the required
> >> > > packaging.
> >> > > > > But there are some issues in the same. Eclipse does not publish
> >> their
> >> > > > > latest artifacts in maven central or any of the other
> >> > repositories[1].
> >> > >  I
> >> > > > > could only find dependencies for 3.6 version of eclipse core
> [2].
> >> > >  Other
> >> > > > > related dependencies like swt, Jfaces [2] etc are also of older
> >> > > versions,
> >> > > > > available via maven central.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > In order to get around the problem I checked how they are doing
> >> it in
> >> > > > tycho
> >> > > > > plugin, as they use the latest versions there. They are packing
> >> their
> >> > > own
> >> > > > > jars and we could use a few(osgi, runtime etc), which can
> provide
> >> us
> >> > > the
> >> > > > > latest versions. I am not sure of what to with the rest, if we
> do
> >> it
> >> > in
> >> > > > > this manner.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Much of the problem is due to the eclipse pde
> >> > > > > libs(core,runtime,osgi,emf,jface,swf etc) that are required for
> >> the
> >> > > > build.
> >> > > > > I have also tried maven-pde plugin but that requires eclipse
> path
> >> of
> >> > > the
> >> > > > > machine. I believe it is not actively developed anymore.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Are there any suggestions ?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > regards
> >> > > > > Rahul
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > [1] https://oss.sonatype.org
> >> > > > > [2] http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.eclipse.core
> >> > > > > [3] http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.eclipse/jface
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to