Hi Gavin, That should do the trick. What Vlad said is right. There was an email thread that explained this in detail. Let me see if I can find that.
thanks, Kishore G On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Gavin Li <[email protected]> wrote: > Can I resolve this by state transition priority and constraint? > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Gavin Li <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +dev and commits > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Gavin Li <[email protected]> > > Date: Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:24 AM > > Subject: question about state transition > > To: [email protected], [email protected] > > > > > > Hi, > > > > We have each server handle some partitions, and we use Master Slave > model. > > > > We need to do some work when transit from offline to slave, sometimes it > > takes long time. So when the server ranked higher in ideal state is up > and > > doing the work during the transition of offline to slave, the other > server > > is changed to slave from master. > > > > This is causing some period of time that there's no master at all which > is > > problematic. Is it possible to bring the other server down when the > higher > > rank server is transiting from slave to master instead of when transition > > from offline to slave? > > > > THanks, > > Gavin Li > > > > >
