Once PR created, it will automatically trigger it.

Best,

Junkai

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 9:09 AM Junkai Xue <junkai....@gmail.com> wrote:

> If no one has further concern about it, let's go for it. This would be the
> last call.
> I would suggest having a release to wrap up all the fixes and changes in
> current 1.0.x and then let's make the major change for JDK 11 as
> lightweight as possible.
>
> Best,
>
> Junkai
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 8:45 AM Komal Desai <kom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there any conclusion on if we can proceed with the JAVA version
>> bump-up to JDK11 ?
>>
>> thanks,
>> komal
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 8:16 PM Junkai Xue <junkai....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks Komal for proposing this and thanks Will for the suggestion! My
>> two cents here: JDK17 has more backward incompatibilities, which may
>> require major version change from 1.0 -> 2.0. Also a Java11 support in the
>> middle could be good for all Helix users, which gives more options.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Junkai
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 6:08 PM Komal Desai <kom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I believe in taking a small step first. If we have smooth sailing with
>> >> JDK11, then next step JDK17.
>> >>
>> >> thanks Will.
>> >> komal
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 4:58 PM William Morgan <will...@morgan-fam.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > If there were a move for Java versions, why not move to 17 (the
>> latest LTS)? I don’t believe there were many breaking changes between those
>> 11 and 17  and nothing even as close as the pain of jumping from 8 to 11.
>> The only limiting factor I’m guessing would be the zookeeper libs, though a
>> cursory search doesn’t show any issues with Java 17. Overall I would be for
>> getting off Java 8 and would be even happier if we ended up on 17, though
>> 11 would be fine.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > Will
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > > On Oct 21, 2022, at 5:52 PM, Komal Desai <kom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > 
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Hello Helix user and developer community,
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Helix has been using JDK-8 as default for the last few years.
>> >> > >> Newer JDK versions have improved performance and improved
>> functionalities.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> I wanted to propose that we move Apache Helix project from using
>> JDK-8 to JDK-11 to leverage better performance.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Please let me know how you would like me to proceed.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> thanks,
>> >> > >> Komal Desai (desaikomal)
>> >> > >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Junkai Xue
>>
>
>
> --
> Junkai Xue
>

Reply via email to