2012/12/16 kishore g <[email protected]>:
> I am fine with adding incubating suffix. I would prefer x.y.z-incubating.
> It kind of helps when we make backward incompatible changes.
not a problem.
release can be 0.6.0-incubating if your prefer

> On Dec 16, 2012 12:27 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Le 16 déc. 2012 09:34, "kishore g" <[email protected]> a écrit :
>> >>
>> >> We can delete the jrat-shiftone.jar from git so that its not part of the
>> >> package, we use it for profiling and it need not be part of the package.
>> >>
>> > Deleted :-)
>> >> Couple of other things if you are doing the vote again. Can we change
>> the
>> >> versioning to 0.6.0, we had talked about it some time back.
>> >>
>> > As we are in incubator AFAIK -incubating is mandatory.
>>
>> That's correct.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > 2012/12/16 Patrick Hunt <[email protected]>:
>> >> > > Good work. -1 at the moment for the following:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > the archive seems to be including a GPL licensed library. From the
>> src
>> >> > archive:
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >
>> ./helix-core/src/main/scripts/integration-test/testcases/shiftone-jrat.jar
>> >> > > which seems to be:
>> >> > > http://jrat.sourceforge.net/lesser.html
>> >> > > Apache releases cannot include GPL'd software.
>> >> > Arg I missed this one.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Have you verified the license for all other files you are including
>> in
>> >> > > your src release artifact and binary convenience artifacts?
>> >> > I spend some time to check (but I can miss files due to human manual
>> > mode
>> >> > :-) ).
>> >> > >
>> >> > > the status page for the project is not up to date:
>> >> > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/helix.html
>> >> > >
>> >> > > The release should be named apache-helix-*
>> >> > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#naming
>> >> > sure
>> >> > >
>> >> > agree.
>> >> > > Why are some of the files .tar and some .zip. Would be nice to be
>> >> > > consistent. Also gzip the tar files. (not a blocker but would be
>> good
>> >> > > to cleanup)
>> >> >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > a couple of scripts are missing license headers: (don't exclude
>> these
>> >> > > in your rat check in pom.xml)
>> >> > >   ./bump-up.command
>> >> > >   ./deploySite.sh
>> >> > >
>> >> > > in helix-admin-webapp-0.6-incubating and helix-core-0.6-incubating
>> the
>> >> > > NOTICE seems to be for a different project?
>> >> > >
>> >> > my bad I copied file from an other project I worked, changed the
>> >> > content but missed the name :-(
>> >> >
>> >> > So I cancel this vote.
>> >> > And will retry an other one.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for the review !!
>> >> >
>> >> > > Patrick
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >> > >> Hi,
>> >> > >> I'd like to release Apache Helix 0.6-incubating.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Jira closed:
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> ** Bug
>> >> > >>     * [HELIX-1] - Use org.apache.helix package for java sources.
>> >> > >>     * [HELIX-2] - Remove jsqlparser dependency from Helix
>> >> > >>     * [HELIX-3] - Fix license headers in sources.
>> >> > >>     * [HELIX-14] - error in helix-core ivy file
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> ** Task
>> >> > >>     * [HELIX-4] - Remove deprecated file based implementation
>> >> > >>     * [HELIX-5] - Remove deprecated Accessors
>> >> > >>     * [HELIX-13] - New usecase to replicate files between replicas
>> >> > >> using simple rsync
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Maven staged release repository:
>> >> > >>
>> >> >
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehelix-019/org/apache/helix/helix/0.6-incubating/
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Distribution:
>> >> > >> * binaries:
>> >> >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/helix/0.6-incubating/binaries/
>> >> > >> * sources:
>> >> >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/helix/0.6-incubating/src/
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Vote open for 72H
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> [+1]
>> >> > >> [0]
>> >> > >> [-1]
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Thanks
>> >> > >> --
>> >> > >> Olivier Lamy
>> >> > >> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>> >> > >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Olivier Lamy
>> >> > Talend: http://coders.talend.com
>> >> > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>> >> >
>>



--
Olivier Lamy
Talend: http://coders.talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

Reply via email to