I +1 for switching to bazel for better structure and procedure to compile the 
topology. I believe a working example of python topology is necessary, and 
require a good angle to show how to utilise the elements of Heron.

Regards J,
Windham Wong
OSWE, OSCP, GCIA, Specialist in Cybersecurity
Co-Founder, Managing Partner of
Stormeye.io, Hong Kong Managed Security Operation Center Limited
Specialist in Cybersecurity, Log Management and SIEM System
Email // [email protected] 
(https://link.getmailspring.com/link/[email protected]/1?redirect=mailto%3Awindham.wong%40stormeye.io&recipient=ZGV2QGhlcm9uLmFwYWNoZS5vcmc%3D)
Phone // +852_3590_2212_|_+852_9832_0707 (tel:+85235902212)
Fax // +852_3590_2202 (tel:+852_3590_2202)

On 9月 11 2021, at 8:07 早上, Saad Ur Rahman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> This would be a massive boon to adoption. If all you need to do is install 
> dependencies, perform a Git pull, and then kick off a build life becomes 
> rather easy.
> On 2021/09/10 22:33:49 Josh Fischer wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > As part of increasing community adoption we need to make it easier to work
> > with heron, work in an IDE and etc. I’m thinking of starting to look this
> > weekend switching from pex_rules to native bazel Python rules. Anyone see
> > any issues with this?
> > --
> > Sent from A Mobile Device
> >
>

Reply via email to