debian 10 has no python 2.7 support. Ubuntu 16.04 has no python 3.7+ dev library support. hope this helps -- Sent from myMail for Android Sunday, 17 May 2020, 11:34AM +08:00 from Ning Wang [email protected] :
>Hi, > >We have talked about it a few times in different places. Let's make a >decision here. We don't have enough resources to support many docker OSes >(technically we only support Debian, Ubuntu, and CentOS but each of them >has multiple versions). > >Things we have agreed on (my understanding) >- for binary release, we are going to choose one OS one version. I >remember that Debian 9 was the decision. An open question is: do we want to >switch to Debian 10 now? We haven't had a binary release yet, so there is >still time. As the main target, I think 1. the image should compile >successfully. and 2 the image should be tested: the tools and an example >topology. > >- for source release, we haven't talked about it very much. Personally I >feel it is a reasonable expectation that, if we have the Docker file in the >core folders, it should at least compile. Otherwise, it's a failed build >hence a failed release. We are not going to test run the tools and examples >for each release though. > >Finally, a question about OS versions. I believe at least two releases >should be supported because most people don't upgrade to the latest version >when it is out in more serious scenarios, hence IMO the second oldest could >often be more useful than the latest one from a convenience point of view. >On the other hand, this is too flexible, and we will spend time thinking >about it again. I think a clear guideline could be helpful to us. For >example: >- We only include only Debian (popular in the server world) and Ubuntu >(popular in servers and workstations). >- for the main OS (Debian) we choose the latest to compile and test for our >binary release. >- for a given OS, only two versions (most likely the most and the second >recent releases) are included in the core source code and they need to be >fixed ASAP if they don't compile. >- OSs and other versions could be included in a special folder and but >there is no guarantee that the code will compile. Fixes from the community >are welcome. > > >How do you guys think? >--ning
