[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14267243#comment-14267243 ]
Xuefu Zhang commented on HIVE-9251: ----------------------------------- The patch looks good. One question though: (-1, -1) is returned for get memory and core call, which makes me wonder what's the behavior on Hive side if that's the case. Should we somehow safeguard on this? > SetSparkReducerParallelism is likely to set too small number of reducers > [Spark Branch] > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HIVE-9251 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9251 > Project: Hive > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: Spark > Reporter: Rui Li > Assignee: Rui Li > Attachments: HIVE-9251.1-spark.patch, HIVE-9251.2-spark.patch > > > This may hurt performance or even lead to task failures. For example, spark's > netty-based shuffle limits the max frame size to be 2G. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)