[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14267243#comment-14267243
 ] 

Xuefu Zhang commented on HIVE-9251:
-----------------------------------

The patch looks good. One question though: (-1, -1) is returned for get memory 
and core call, which makes me wonder what's the behavior on Hive side if that's 
the case. Should we somehow safeguard on this?

> SetSparkReducerParallelism is likely to set too small number of reducers 
> [Spark Branch]
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-9251
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9251
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Spark
>            Reporter: Rui Li
>            Assignee: Rui Li
>         Attachments: HIVE-9251.1-spark.patch, HIVE-9251.2-spark.patch
>
>
> This may hurt performance or even lead to task failures. For example, spark's 
> netty-based shuffle limits the max frame size to be 2G.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to