Hi Folks,

Creating a new formal vote thread for this. After looking at the bylaws
page, it looks like we need to have a formal vote on it by the PMC members.

Thanks
Vikram.

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Lefty Leverenz <leftylever...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
>
> -- Lefty
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Vikram Dixit K <vikram.di...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of
> > time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers
> > much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an addition
> > to the committer bylaws as follows (taken from the hadoop project bylaws
> > http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html):
> >
> > "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative
> > branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch
> to
> > its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch
> > committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active
> > release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project."
> >
> > I am +1 on this.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Vikram.
> >
>



-- 
Nothing better than when appreciated for hard work.
-Mark

Reply via email to