+1 On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:14 AM, Szehon Ho <sze...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Makes sense, +1 > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Brock Noland <br...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan <hashut...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> With so much active development in different areas of project, proposal >>> makes sense. >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Alan Gates <alanfga...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Alan. >>>> >>>> Vikram Dixit K <vikram.di...@gmail.com> >>>> February 9, 2015 at 14:43 >>>> Hi Folks, >>>> >>>> We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of >>>> time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers >>>> much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an >> addition >>>> to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project >> bylaws >>>> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html ) >>>> >>>> "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative >>>> branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch >> to >>>> its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch >>>> committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active >>>> release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project." >>>> >>>> Actions: New Branch Committer >>>> Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project. >>>> Approval: Lazy Consensus >>>> Binding Votes: Active PMC members >>>> Minimum Length: 3 days >>>> Mailing List: priv...@hive.apache.org >>>> >>>> Actions: Removal of Branch Committer >>>> Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project. >>>> Approval: Consensus >>>> Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question if >>>> they are PMC members too. >>>> Minimum Length: 6 days >>>> Mailing List: priv...@hive.apache.org >>>> >>>> This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Vikram. >>>> >>>> >>> >>
