Doing it now... Updated task at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2368
-----Original Message----- From: John Sichi [mailto:jsi...@fb.com] Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 5:07 PM To: <dev@hive.apache.org> Cc: dev@hive.apache.org; Carl Steinbach Subject: Re: Apache Hive 0.8.0 Release Candidate 0 Sure, do you want to go ahead and backport it? JVS On Oct 27, 2011, at 4:01 PM, "Paul Yang" <py...@fb.com> wrote: > Can we include HIVE-2368 in the RC? Otherwise, drop performance will > be too slow for tables with lots of partitions. > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Sichi [mailto:jsi...@fb.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 2:03 PM > To: dev@hive.apache.org; Carl Steinbach > Subject: Re: Apache Hive 0.8.0 Release Candidate 0 > > I did the following testing on this RC. > > Getting Started: basic sanity testing with pokes table > Source: build and package (did not run ant test yet, will do so on > next RC) > PDK: built and ran examples/test-plugin > Upgrade: tested script for MySQL upgrade from 0.7.1 (starting with > fresh 0.7.0 schema creation script) to 0.8 using partitioned invites > table > > I logged HIVE-2529 for the missing PostgreSQL metastore upgrade > script. > > RELEASE_NOTES.txt has regressed to the 0.6 content (0.7.1 has the > correct content). > > For README.txt, maybe we should use the new wording from the wiki for > the first line since it's now the official project trademark > description? And throw in a bunch of (TM)'s for good measure, since > we love them so much? > > Looking forward to RC1! > > JVS > > On Oct 21, 2011, at 2:51 PM, Carl Steinbach wrote: > >> Apache Hive 0.8.0 Release Candidate 0 is available here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~cws/hive-0.8.0-candidate-0/ >> >> This RC does not include patches for the following tickets which are >> currently marked as blockers: >> >> * HIVE-2391. Published POMs in Maven repo are incorrect >> * HIVE-2521. Update wiki links in README >> >> We plan to include patches for both of these tickets in RC1, but >> would appreciate it if folks would look at this RC in an attempt to >> find any other blockers. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Carl >
