-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58181/#review171761
-----------------------------------------------------------




ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/calcite/translator/SqlFunctionConverter.java
Lines 355 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58181/#comment244771>

    Do we need to register _is distinct from_ as well ?



ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/parse/TypeCheckProcFactory.java
Lines 719-726 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58181/#comment244772>

    Won't we have this when user directly uses not <=> in query. How is that 
handled without this special map?


- Ashutosh Chauhan


On April 12, 2017, 12:14 a.m., Vineet Garg wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58181/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 12, 2017, 12:14 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for hive, Ashutosh Chauhan, Jesús Camacho Rodríguez, and 
> Pengcheng Xu.
> 
> 
> Bugs: HIVE-15986
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15986
> 
> 
> Repository: hive-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch adds support for 'is distinct from' and 'is not distinct from'.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   itests/src/test/resources/testconfiguration.properties fb85b9ece2 
>   
> ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/calcite/translator/SqlFunctionConverter.java
>  85450c999f 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/parse/IdentifiersParser.g 8c4ee8a38b 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/parse/TypeCheckProcFactory.java 
> f979c1432e 
>   ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/is_distinct_from.q PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/is_distinct_from.q.out PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58181/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added new tests
> Pre-commit testing
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vineet Garg
> 
>

Reply via email to