See the above comment. Will uncomment when I can run the test with correct 
result to verify :)

From: Deepak Jaiswal 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of 
Deepak Jaiswal <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: Deepak Jaiswal 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 14:45
To: Deepak Jaiswal <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Sergey Shelukhin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: Review Request 60478: HIVE-16761 LLAP IO: SMB joins fail elevator

This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: 
https://reviews.apache.org/r/60478/


Looks good to me. Can you please address one minor comment?

llap-server/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/llap/io/api/impl/LlapRecordReader.java<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60478/diff/1/?file=1764267#file1764267line197>(Diff
 revision 1)

        183

    // TODO: try to find the fake merge work for SMB join, that is really 
another MapWork.


Why is this code block commented out? Is it not needed anymore?


- Deepak Jaiswal


On June 27th, 2017, 6:24 p.m. UTC, Sergey Shelukhin wrote:

Review request for hive and Deepak Jaiswal.
By Sergey Shelukhin.

Updated June 27, 2017, 6:24 p.m.

Repository: hive-git
Description

see jira


Diffs

  *   itests/src/test/resources/testconfiguration.properties (0aadee3e3d)
  *   
llap-server/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/llap/io/api/impl/LlapInputFormat.java
 (c22d446320)
  *   
llap-server/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/llap/io/api/impl/LlapRecordReader.java
 (d4e14a88c2)
  *   
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/vector/VectorizedRowBatchCtx.java 
(e546a658c7)
  *   ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/llap_smb.q (PRE-CREATION)
  *   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/llap/llap_smb.q.out (PRE-CREATION)

View Diff<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60478/diff/1/>

Reply via email to