Thanks for testing out the RC and your vote.
With 3 +1s, the vote passes. I will work on the release now.

Regards,
Deepak

On 7/18/18, 9:14 AM, "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez" <jcama...@apache.org> wrote:

    +1
    
    Built from sources and ran tests.
    
    -Jesús
    
    
    
    On 7/16/18, 10:31 AM, "Ashutosh Chauhan" <hashut...@apache.org> wrote:
    
        +1
        Built from sources.
        Ran unit tests.
        Checksums and sigs matched up.
        
        On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 8:58 AM Owen O'Malley <owen.omal...@gmail.com>
        wrote:
        
        > +1
        >
        > built & ran tests
        > checked checksums & signature
        > tested with ORC
        >
        > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Deepak Jaiswal 
<djais...@hortonworks.com>
        > wrote:
        >
        > > Hi,
        > >
        > > I have prepared the rc1 off of branch-3.1.
        > > Artifacts:
        > > Tag : https://github.com/apache/hive/releases/tag/storage-
        > > release-2.7.0-rc1
        > > Tar Ball : http://home.apache.org/~djaiswal/hive-storage-2.7.0/
        > >
        > > Regards,
        > > Deepak
        > >
        > > On 7/10/18, 10:16 AM, "Deepak Jaiswal" <djais...@hortonworks.com>
        > wrote:
        > >
        > >     Thanks Owen for finding this out. I will work on the next RC 
once
        > this
        > > blocker is resolved.
        > >
        > >     Regards,
        > >     Deepak
        > >
        > >     On 7/10/18, 9:40 AM, "Owen O'Malley" <owen.omal...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
        > >
        > >         Ok, Jesus and I tracked it down and I've filed
        > >         https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-20135 that is a
        > > blocker on
        > >         storage-api 2.7.0.
        > >
        > >         The impact was that orc 1.5 and master failed with the RC. 
orc
        > 1.4
        > > and
        > >         older were fine.
        > >
        > >         .. Owen
        > >
        > >         On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 8:17 AM, Owen O'Malley <
        > > owen.omal...@gmail.com>
        > >         wrote:
        > >
        > >         > I wanted to give an update on this. For now, I'm -1 
because the
        > > ORC
        > >         > (branch-1.5) tests fail with this RC. I'll dig into what 
is
        > > wrong, but it
        > >         > looks like something in the timezone changes broke 
backwards
        > > compatibility.
        > >         >
        > >         > .. Owen
        > >         >
        > >         > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Deepak Jaiswal <
        > > djais...@hortonworks.com>
        > >         > wrote:
        > >         >
        > >         >> Thanks Alan.
        > >         >>
        > >         >> On 7/9/18, 10:17 AM, "Alan Gates" <alanfga...@gmail.com>
        > wrote:
        > >         >>
        > >         >>     +1.  Did a build with a clean maven repo, checked the
        > > signature and
        > >         >> sha
        > >         >>     hash, ran RAT.
        > >         >>
        > >         >>     Alan.
        > >         >>
        > >         >>     On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 2:21 PM Deepak Jaiswal <
        > >         >> djais...@hortonworks.com>
        > >         >>     wrote:
        > >         >>
        > >         >>     > Hi,
        > >         >>     >
        > >         >>     > I would like to make a new release of the 
storage-api.
        > It
        > > contains
        > >         >> changes
        > >         >>     > required for Hive 3.1 release.
        > >         >>     >
        > >         >>     > Artifcats:
        > >         >>     > Tag :
        > >         >>     > 
https://github.com/apache/hive/releases/tag/storage-
        > > release-
        > >         >> 2.7.0-rc0
        > >         >>     > Tar Ball : http://home.apache.org/~
        > > djaiswal/hive-storage-2.7.0/
        > >         >>     >
        > >         >>     > Regards,
        > >         >>     > Deepak
        > >         >>     >
        > >         >>
        > >         >>
        > >         >>
        > >         >
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > >
        >
        
    
    
    

Reply via email to