Thanks, Dongjoon.

I've committed the fix to master and storage-branch-2.8. Given that I
wanted to get HIVE-25190 released,
I'll roll RCs for 2.8.1 and 2.7.3 today.

.. Owen

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 8:36 AM Panos Garefalakis <panga...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Dongjoon for the details!
> Looks like we are going to need a follow-up release sooner than later!
>
> On the positive side, HIVE-25386 <https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/2531
> >
> passed tests and we can now move forward.
>
> Cheers,
> Panagiotis
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 9:56 AM Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi, All.
> >
> > It turns out that 2.8.0 has a regression in terms of the dependency
> > although it passed all tests.
> > At Apache Hive 2.2.0, HIVE-13906 removed the Guava compile dependency.
> > However, recently, HIVE-24542 converts the test dependency to the compile
> > dependency.
> >
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/1784/files#diff-e5e45b8481f3d87f4fa561d45b22fa20bb5084e5240d825717e6bde511b733baL122
> >
> > I noticed this breaking dependency change during Apache ORC integration
> > stage.
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/773
> >
> > For now, I filed a JIRA issue and made a PR. Please comment your opinion
> > on the Hive and ORC PRs.
> > - HIVE-25386: hive-storage-api should not have guava compile dependency
> > - https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/2531
> >
> > Bests,
> > Dongjoon.
> >
> > On 2021/07/23 16:40:39, "Owen O'Malley" <owen.omal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I can do the publishing. Thank you all!
> > >
> > > .. Owen
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 10:16 AM Panos Garefalakis <panga...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thank you all for your help! With 3 binding votes this release
> passed!
> > > > I am going to send a vote result follow up but will need some PMC
> help
> > > > creating the new Storage API version (on Jira) and releasing (upload
> > > > artifacts)!
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Panagiotis
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 2:21 AM Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Owen! I just verified the checksum and gpg signature and
> they
> > both
> > > > > look good, so +1 too.
> > > > >
> > > > > Panos: please fix the "Fix version" of the JIRA when you get a
> > chance.
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Chao
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 2:29 PM Owen O'Malley <
> > owen.omal...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Chao,
> > > > >>    Panos key doesn't seem to have propagated to the Apache
> servers.
> > It
> > > > >> referenced here:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ as "pgaref
> > > > >> 7DFAB216AB7D96B3B2072184DC11DE4D00F8FA1D"
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The key itself can be found here:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> >
> https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?search=pgaref&fingerprint=on&op=index
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 8:47 PM Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > I built the source from the branch and ran the tests, which all
> > > > passed.
> > > > >> > However I was not able to find the public GPG key. Panos: could
> > you
> > > > >> point
> > > > >> > me to the location?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Also seems we should create a new version 2.8.0 in the JIRA
> page:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HIVE?selectedItem=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:release-page
> > > > >> > and update "Fix version" of
> > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-24458
> > > > >> > .
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Chao
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 9:10 AM Szehon Ho <
> > szehon.apa...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > * Built module
> > > > >> > > * Ran tests
> > > > >> > > * Checked artifact checksum and signature
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Thanks
> > > > >> > > Szehon
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 2:11 PM Owen O'Malley <
> > > > owen.omal...@gmail.com
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > I think we should go ahead and release storage-api 2.8.0 and
> > catch
> > > > >> it
> > > > >> > on
> > > > >> > > > the next cycle. HIVE-25190 is a long standing bug that
> rarely
> > > > >> affects
> > > > >> > > > users. (We have had a user at LinkedIn hit it, which is why
> I
> > > > fixed
> > > > >> > it.)
> > > > >> > > > I'll sign up to make the 2.8.1 (and 2.7.3) bug fix releases
> > > > >> afterwards.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > .. Owen
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 8:53 PM Chao Sun <
> sunc...@apache.org>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Going to check the release and vote here too. Since
> > HIVE-25190
> > > > is
> > > > >> > > already
> > > > >> > > > > merged, instead of waiting for another release, should we
> > start
> > > > >> > another
> > > > >> > > > RC1
> > > > >> > > > > with that included?
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Chao
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 1:30 PM Dongjoon Hyun <
> > > > >> dongj...@apache.org>
> > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > +1
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > * Build and tested locally.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >> > > > > > Dongjoon.
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > On 2021/07/19 23:15:46, "Owen O'Malley" <
> > > > owen.omal...@gmail.com
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > +1 (binding):
> > > > >> > > > > > > * Built and tested
> > > > >> > > > > > > * Built hive main branch using it
> > > > >> > > > > > > * Verified signatures and checksums
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > It is too bad that we didn't get HIVE-25190 into it,
> but
> > > > that
> > > > >> can
> > > > >> > > > wait
> > > > >> > > > > > for
> > > > >> > > > > > > 2.8.1.
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > .. Owen
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 9:44 PM Pavan Lanka
> > > > >> > > <pla...@apple.com.invalid
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > I have done the following:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > * Built and Tested storage-release-2.8.0-rc0 using
> > > > OpenJDK8
> > > > >> > > > > > > > * Built and Tested ORC with updated storage api
> > version
> > > > >> > > > > > > >   - Had to fix a test class that implements
> > PredicateLeaf
> > > > >> which
> > > > >> > > > has a
> > > > >> > > > > > new
> > > > >> > > > > > > > method. This is a breaking change but I think this
> > should
> > > > >> be ok
> > > > >> > > > > > > > * Verified the performance gains of HIVE-24458
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > Pavan
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Jun 21, 2021, at 8:07 AM, Panos Garefalakis <
> > > > >> > > > panga...@gmail.com
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hello all,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Following on previous discussions, I would like to
> > > > >> propose a
> > > > >> > > new
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > storage-api release including HIVE-24458
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-24458
> >.
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Shall we release the following artifacts as Hive
> > Storage
> > > > >> API
> > > > >> > > > 2.8.0?
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > tar:
> > http://home.apache.org/~pgaref/hive-storage-2.8.0/
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > tag:
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> >
> > https://github.com/apache/hive/releases/tag/storage-release-2.8.0-rc0
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > jiras:
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HIVE/versions/12350287
> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > >> > > > > > > > > Panagiotis
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to