I was confused about the subject line since it says 3.x as well along with 1.x and 2.x. Does this discussion include all 1.x, 2.x and 3.x or just 1.x and 2.x?
I think it makes sense to EOL 1.x. Looks like 2.x is still being maintained by Chao and I think we were backporting PRs to the 3.x line pretty recently so I believe we should wait out for a release on Hive 3.x. Thanks, Vihang On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:40 PM Attila Turoczy <aturo...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote: > Dear PMC's, > > Do we have a verdict / decision about this? > > -Attila > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 5:45 PM Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On Hive 2.x, I'm still preparing for another release 2.3.10 (Hive 2.3 > > branch is being actively maintained so far). Hopefully this will be > > the last release in the branch-2 line. > > > > +1 on making Hive 1 EOL for the time being. > > > > Chao > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 8:10 AM Sankar Hariappan > > <sankar.hariap...@microsoft.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > +1 for making both Hive 1&2 EOL > > > > > > -Sankar > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Attila Turoczy <aturo...@cloudera.com.INVALID> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2024 7:37 PM > > > To: dev@hive.apache.org > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] End of life for Hive 1.x, 2.x, 3.x > > > > > > [You don't often get email from aturo...@cloudera.com.invalid. Learn > > why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > > > > > +1 for making it EOL for Hive 1 and Hive 2. I do not think these 2 > > product > > > branches are relevant in 2023. > > > > > > -Attila > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 12:59 PM Denys Kuzmenko <dkuzme...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 for marking Hive 1.x EOL > > > > > > > > Assuming no volunteers willing to take ownership of branch-2 > > maintenance, > > > > +1 to declare it EOL as well. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Denys > > > > > > >
