Hi Wechar,
The proposed signature covers a wider use case, making the existing one no
longer needed
new:
List<Partition> dropPartitions(String dbName, String tblName,
RequestPartsSpec partsSpec,
PartitionDropOptions options)
existing:
List<Partition> dropPartitions(String dbName, String tblName,
List<Pair<Integer, byte[]>> partExprs,
PartitionDropOptions options)
however, can we wrap everything into the `DropPartitionsRequest` instead of
introducing 2 API methods: one for default catalog and one with catalog param?
Regards,
Denys
