[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-4089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13699137#comment-13699137
 ] 

Ashutosh Chauhan commented on HIVE-4089:
----------------------------------------

DN author [~andy] comments on mail thread above is worth considering.
{quote}
> "jdo2-api-2.3-ec" was an artifact created by DataNucleus as a temporary
> measure so that we could continue to provide new features for things that
> were
> not officially released on Apache JDO (due to the time it was taking to
> get an
> official release).
>
> I can't see how Apache JDO can push something to Maven Central when they
> didn't provide it in the first place. You would be better advised to
> upgrade
> your project to use "jdo-api-3.0.jar" which was released 2 years ago and
> superceded "v2.3-ec" and _likely_ would be compatible.
{quote}

In light of this I strongly believe we should upgrade to 3.0.1 
[~appodictic] If you test it as you suggested above and find out that for some 
arcane reason our current version 2.3-ec turns out to be better than 3.0.1 even 
in that case since 2.3-ec is not a supported version, if there are bugs or 
other issues in future we need to upgrade than. Since we already have 1 issue 
at hand, I think we should upgrade now. What do you think?
                
> javax.jdo : jdo2-api dependency not in Maven Central
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-4089
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-4089
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Nitay Joffe
>            Assignee: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
>         Attachments: HIVE-4089.D11253.1.patch
>
>
> The latest open source hive release (0.10.0) depends on javax.jdo artifact 
> jdo2-api version 2.3-ec. This version is not actually in maven central, which 
> means everyone who uses hive requires custom maven repository definitions 
> which is discouraged by maven folks. I pinged the javax.jdo guys about it and 
> they recommended we upgrade to 3.0. See http://goo.gl/fAoRn for the 
> conversation.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to