Well, the ASF review board does currently work. Our dev guide suggests that either it or fabricator are fine. Generally all of my own jira submissions include a RB, so I'm fairly confident it works (for the features that RB has generally).
I presume something as strong as a statement of "we're going to stop using fabrictor" as a project would require a PMC vote? -Sean On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com>wrote: > I do not know what to say on this, other then we are stuck between a rock > and a hard place. I would say we should just stop using fabricator all > together, but then again we already have two tickets opened with > ASF-infrastructure not going anywhere for months (moving our site to a CMS, > fixing the broken confluence to wiki publishing) so moving the process > officially to some ASF review board type thing might have similar issues. > > What we might have to do is host phabricator ourselves like we are hosting > our unit testing ourselves. I do not know what else to say on this. > > > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > Bump. Any update on this? > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com > > >wrote: > > > > > I do not like this. It is inconvenience when using a mobile device, but > > > more importantly it does not seem very transparent to our end users. > For > > > example, a user is browsing jira they may want to review the code only > on > > > review board (not yet attached to the issue), they should not be forced > > to > > > "sign up" to help in the process. > > > > > > Would anyone from facebook care to chime in here? I think we all like > > > fabricator for the most part. Our docs suggest this fabricator is our > > > de-facto review system. As an ASF project I do not think requiring a > > login > > > on some external service even to review a jira is correct. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Xuefu Zhang <xzh...@cloudera.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Yeah. I used to be able to view w/o login, but now I am not. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Brock Noland <br...@cloudera.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Personally I prefer Review Board. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Edward Capriolo < > > > edlinuxg...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > I never remeber having to log into phabricator to view a patch. > Has > > > > this > > > > > > changed recently? I believe that having to create an external > > account > > > > to > > > > > > view a patch in progress is not something we should be doing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://mrunit.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sean > > > -- Sean