[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-6429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sergey Shelukhin updated HIVE-6429:
-----------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 0.13.0
           Status: Resolved  (was: Patch Available)

committed to trunk

> MapJoinKey has large memory overhead in typical cases
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-6429
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-6429
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
>            Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin
>             Fix For: 0.13.0
>
>         Attachments: HIVE-6429.01.patch, HIVE-6429.02.patch, 
> HIVE-6429.03.patch, HIVE-6429.04.patch, HIVE-6429.05.patch, 
> HIVE-6429.06.patch, HIVE-6429.07.patch, HIVE-6429.08.patch, 
> HIVE-6429.09.patch, HIVE-6429.10.patch, HIVE-6429.WIP.patch, HIVE-6429.patch
>
>
> The only thing that MJK really needs it hashCode and equals (well, and 
> construction), so there's no need to have array of writables in there. 
> Assuming all the keys for a table have the same structure, for the common 
> case where keys are primitive types, we can store something like a byte array 
> combination of keys to reduce the memory usage. Will probably speed up 
> compares too.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to