In my read of the Apache git - github integration blog post we cannot use
pull requests as patches. Just that we'll be notified of them and could
perhaps use them as code review.

One additional item I think we should investigate is disabling merge
commits on trunk and feature branches.
On Mar 7, 2014 7:57 PM, "Edward Capriolo" <edlinuxg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We need to keep patches in Jira I feel. We have gotten better on the
> documentation front but having a patch in the jira is critical I feel. We
> must at least have a perma link to the changes.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Sergey Shelukhin <ser...@hortonworks.com
> >wrote:
>
> > +1 to git!
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Xuefu Zhang <xzh...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Switching to git from svn seems to be a proposal slightly different
> from
> > > that of switching to pull request from the head of the thread.
> Personally
> > > I'm +1 to git, but I think patches are very portable and widely adopted
> > in
> > > Hadoop ecosystem and we should keep the practice. Thus, +1 to that
> also.
> > >
> > > --Xuefu
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Gunther Hagleitner <
> > > ghagleit...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Once Prasad's loop finishes I'd like to add my +1 too.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Vaibhav Gumashta <
> > > > vgumas...@hortonworks.com
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for moving to git!
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > --Vaibhav
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Prasad Mujumdar <
> > pras...@cloudera.com
> > > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >   while (true) {
> > > > > >    +1
> > > > > >   }
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   +1  // another, just in case ;)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks
> > > > > > Prasad
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 6:47 AM, kulkarni.swar...@gmail.com <
> > > > > > kulkarni.swar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Thejas Nair <
> > > the...@hortonworks.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Should we start with moving our primary source code
> repository
> > > from
> > > > > > > > svn to git ? I feel git is more powerful and easy to use
> (once
> > > you
> > > > go
> > > > > > > > past the learning curve!).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Brock Noland <
> > br...@cloudera.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Personally I prefer the Github workflow, but I believe
> there
> > > have
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > some challenges with that since the source for apache
> > projects
> > > > must
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > stored in apache source control (git or svn).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Relevent:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:19 AM, kulkarni.swar...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > <kulkarni.swar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> Hello,
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Since we have a nice mirrored git repository for hive[1],
> > any
> > > > > > specific
> > > > > > > > >> reason why we can't switch to doing pull requests instead
> of
> > > > > > patches?
> > > > > > > > IMHO
> > > > > > > > >> pull requests are awesome for peer review plus it is also
> > very
> > > > > easy
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > keep
> > > > > > > > >> track of JIRAs with open pull requests instead of looking
> > for
> > > > > JIRAs
> > > > > > > in a
> > > > > > > > >> "Patch Available" state. Also since they get updated
> > > > > automatically,
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > >> also very easy to see if a review comment made by a
> reviewer
> > > was
> > > > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > > > >> properly or not.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Thoughts?
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/hive
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > >> Swarnim
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce -
> > > > http://mrunit.apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > > > > > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the
> individual
> > or
> > > > > > entity
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> > > > > confidential,
> > > > > > > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
> If
> > > the
> > > > > > reader
> > > > > > > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> > > > > notified
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution,
> disclosure
> > or
> > > > > > > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
> you
> > > > have
> > > > > > > > received this communication in error, please contact the
> sender
> > > > > > > immediately
> > > > > > > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Swarnim
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> > > entity
> > > > to
> > > > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> > confidential,
> > > > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> > > reader
> > > > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> > notified
> > > > that
> > > > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> have
> > > > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > > > immediately
> > > > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> > entity
> > > to
> > > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> confidential,
> > > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> > reader
> > > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified
> > > that
> > > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > > immediately
> > > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >
>

Reply via email to