[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14157678#comment-14157678
 ] 

Lefty Leverenz commented on HIVE-8290:
--------------------------------------

Looks good, [~alangates].  I'll add a link to the TBLPROPERTIES information in 
the DDL doc and include TRANSACTIONAL and NO_AUTO_COMPACTION there too.  
They're both boolean, right?

Was *hive.support.concurrency* required for transactions in 0.13.0?  If not, 
the configuration table should include version information.  In either case, 
I'll update the Configuration Properties doc.

* [LanguageManual DDL -- Create Table | 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+DDL#LanguageManualDDL-CreateTable]
  (TBLPROPERTIES described in bullet list after the syntax)
* [Configuration Properties -- Transactions and Compactor | 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/Configuration+Properties#ConfigurationProperties-TransactionsandCompactor]
 (list of parameters that turn on transactions)
* [Configuration Properties -- hive.support.concurrency | 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/Configuration+Properties#ConfigurationProperties-hive.support.concurrency]
 (mention that it's needed for transactions, with link to Transactions doc)

> With DbTxnManager configured, all ORC tables forced to be transactional
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-8290
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8290
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Transactions
>    Affects Versions: 0.14.0
>            Reporter: Alan Gates
>            Assignee: Alan Gates
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.14.0
>
>         Attachments: HIVE-8290.2.patch, HIVE-8290.patch
>
>
> Currently, once a user configures DbTxnManager to the be transaction manager, 
> all tables that use ORC are expected to be transactional.  This means they 
> all have to have buckets.  This most likely won't be what users want.
> We need to add a specific mark to a table so that users can indicate it 
> should be treated in a transactional way.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to