-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26661/#review56449
-----------------------------------------------------------



ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/spark/HiveBaseFunctionResultList.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26661/#comment96779>

    Nit: could we put -1L or skip it and suppress the warning instead of a 
random number for this?



ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/spark/HiveKVResultCache.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26661/#comment96780>

    Do you mean one thread can access hasNext() and next(), while multiple 
threads can concurrently access add()? The doc here is a little unclear on this.



ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/spark/HiveKVResultCache.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26661/#comment96782>

    I think the condition check should be also in the synchronized block, as it 
accesses protected resources: container.rowCount() and cursor.



ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/spark/HiveKVResultCache.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26661/#comment96783>

    Same here, cursor and container are protected resources and they need to be 
in the synchnized block.



ql/src/test/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/spark/TestHiveKVResultCache.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26661/#comment96784>

    Same here.


- Xuefu Zhang


On Oct. 13, 2014, 9:33 p.m., Jimmy Xiang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/26661/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 13, 2014, 9:33 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for hive and Xuefu Zhang.
> 
> 
> Bugs: HIVE-7873
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-7873
> 
> 
> Repository: hive-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Re-enabled lazy HiveBaseFunctionResultList. A separate RowContainer is used 
> to work around the no-write-after-read limitation of RowContainer. The patch 
> also fixed a concurrency issue in HiveKVResultCache. Synchronized is used 
> instead of reentrant lock since I assume there won't be many threads to 
> access the cache.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/spark/HiveBaseFunctionResultList.java
>  0df2580 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/spark/HiveKVResultCache.java 
> a6b9037 
>   ql/src/test/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/spark/TestHiveKVResultCache.java 
> 496a11f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26661/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Unit test, some simple perf test.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jimmy Xiang
> 
>

Reply via email to